My curated US stocks for 2025

Tips D – US Stock Exchanges. A summary of the fundamental analysis of my curated US-listed companies that I covered in 2025. Updated 25 Jul 2025

Investing in US stocks requires more than just following trends. It demands a deep dive into fundamentals, financial strength, and long-term business viability. In this article, I provide concise summaries of the US-listed companies I have analysed in detail and published elsewhere.

Each stock is evaluated based on several characteristics, such as profitability trends, financial health, and competitive positioning. I will also summarize the valuation, helping long-term investors assess potential risks and rewards.

This is a living article, meaning I will continuously update it with new stock analyses throughout the year. Whether you are searching for undervalued opportunities, assessing turnaround plays, or looking for stable income stocks, these insights will provide a data-driven perspective on each company's position.

Each company covered here is a standalone summary of my company analysis and valuation. Stay tuned for regular updates as I expand this curated list of deep-dive stock research.

Should you go and invest in them? Well, read my Disclaimer.

1. Ceragon Networks

2. Ciena Corporation

3. Graham Corporation

4. Impinj

5. Limbach

6. MasTech

7. Microchip Technology

8. Mosaic

9. NetApp

10. Nordson

11. Nutrien

12. Onto Innovation

13. Ouster

14. Pegasystems

15. Red Violet

16. Targa Resources

17. Tetra Tech

18. Verisign

19. Westlake Chemical Partners

20. Westlake Corp

21. Zebra Technologies

This blog is reader-supported. When you buy through links in the post, the blog will earn a small commission. The payment comes from the retailer and not from you. Learn more.

1. Ceragon Networks

Turnaround Play in Wireless Transport

Ceragon Networks specializes in wireless transport solutions, catering to telecom providers and private network operators. Historically focused on microwave backhaul, the company has expanded into broader wireless transport technologies and is leveraging this repositioning for renewed growth.

Ceragon evolved from a wireless backhaul firm into a broader wireless transport company. From a 2020 revenue trough, it achieved 9.5% CAGR through 2024.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue and profit bottomed out in 2020; profits recovered in 2023.

Gross and contribution margins improved due to supply chain efficiencies and increased North America sales.

Revenue growth may face pressure from declining telco CAPEX.

Revenue shift to North America (24% in 2024) has improved profitability.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Fixed costs - 33% of total cost; leverage helped drive profit growth.

Cost improvements seen as structural (e.g., shift to higher-value solutions).

SGA margin declined in tandem with margin expansion.

Peer Comparison

Outperformed wireless transport peers in recent revenue growth.

Middle-of-pack in long-term ROIC, but improving.

Positioned to surpass peers post-2023.

Ceragon is one of the few peers with sustained growth since 2016.

Financial Position

USD 34 million cash (11% of assets) as of Sep 2024.

Debt-equity ratio down from 45% (2022) to 26%.

Strong cash conversion: USD 133 million CFO vs USD 23 million net income (2015–2024).

Valuation & Investment Risk

Valuation offers > 30% margin of safety.

The reinvestment rate exceeds NOPAT, but it is expected to normalize.

Cyclical exposure tempered by diversification into private networks.

Conclusion

Ceragon’s turnaround appears credible, supported by structural margin improvements and strategic diversification. The stock offers an attractive margin of safety and is well-positioned to outperform if growth continues post-2024.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 31 Jan 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Ceragon Networks' Comeback: Stronger Margins, Higher Growth”

Ceragon Networks: Turnaround Play in Wireless Transpor

2. Ciena Corporation

Solid Performer, But Returns on the Decline

Ciena Corporation is a major player in networking infrastructure, known for its optical transport and network automation technologies. Despite its leadership in performance-focused telecom equipment, the company faces challenges balancing capital investment with returns.

Ciena’s stock has surged, but ROIC has fallen amid high reinvestment and slow core growth.

Hardware-centric model limits scalability vs. software-driven peers.

ROIC decline contrasts sharply with market optimism and rising share price.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

5.7% CAGR (2015–2024); hardware remains ~79% of revenue.

Profit growth > revenue growth, but ROIC declined at 8.7% CAGR.

Nominal ROE growth of just 1.2% CAGR.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Margins are stagnant despite cost controls.

Contribution margin slightly declined; fixed cost margin improved.

High reinvestment rate (~70%) with low sustainable return.

Peer Comparison

One of the largest in its segment, with lower growth than peers.

Best-in-class ROIC and EBIT margin; weak FCF margin.

Capital efficiency is a concern despite profitability.

Financial Position

USD 1.3 billion cash (22% of assets); strong liquidity.

USD 3.0 billion CFO vs USD 2.6 billion PAT (2015–2024).

Debt-capital ratio low; financial health strong.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Overvalued even under optimistic scenarios.

Strong peer metrics on ROIC and EBIT, but FCF margin lagging.

Growth strategy depends on capital-heavy expansion with modest returns.

Conclusion

Ciena is operationally strong but capital inefficient, with declining ROIC and limited margin upside. The current market optimism seems detached from financial fundamentals, making the stock appear overvalued.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 27 Feb 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Ciena's Stock Is Soaring, But Are Investors Ignoring A Major Red Flag?”

Ciena Corporation Solid Performer, But Returns on the Decline

3. Graham Corporation

Bold Bet: Growth Play or M&A Gamble?

Graham Corporation specializes in mission-critical fluid, power, heat transfer, and vacuum technologies for industries including defense, space, energy, and process applications.

Over the past decade, the company has diversified its product portfolio and shifted focus such that defense has overtaken refining as the largest revenue contributor. This transformation aligns with industry growth trends.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

2014-2025 revenue growth. 6.1 % CAGR, with the bulk of growth occurring post-2021.

With no M&A activity before 2021, organic growth was effectively flat or negative.

Net income declined from 2014-2022, bottoming out in 2022 due to cost overruns on a U.S. Navy defense contract and higher SGA expenses.

ROIC averaged 10 %, ROE just 2 %, indicating minimal shareholder value creation.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Graham has placed significant emphasis on operational improvements post-2022, especially following the cost overrun on its defense contract.

Efficiency metrics (2022-2025)

Operating profit margin & ROA improved.

Inventory turnover & operating expenses worsened.

Capital efficiency (Reinvestment margin, asset turnover) showed gains.

Margins show a positive trend

Gross profit margin and contribution margin have been improving since 2022.

Operating profit margin improved post-2023, reversing a decade-long decline.

Breakeven concerns. The company operates close to breakeven, meaning that revenue growth and margin expansion must improve further.

M&A Strategy & Effectiveness

Graham plans continued M&A to supplement organic growth, as per its December 2024 Noble Conference presentation.

M&A performance (2022-2025).

US 81 million spent on acquisitions (Barber-Nichols & P3).

9 % ROIC in 2025 suggests a 9-year payback period assuming all returns were M&A-driven.

Reinvestment rate concerns

Historically 86 % of NOPAT (high but sustainable).

Theoretical rate (per fundamental growth equation) suggests 61 % would be ideal, indicating a potential overinvestment risk.

Financial Position

GHM remains financially sound, allowing it time to execute its strategy:

Cash Reserves: USD 32 million (13 % of total assets).

Debt-Equity Ratio: 6 % (down from 28 % in 2022).

Cash Flow Strength:

Positive operating cash flow in 10 out of the last 12 years.

USD 147 million operating cash flow (2014-2025) vs USD 34 million net income, reflecting strong cash conversion.

Capital allocation discipline. Operating cash flow covered CAPEX and acquisitions, with excess used to reduce debt and return value to shareholders.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value of USD 52 per share vs. market price USD 43 (Jan 8, 2025). This is a 21 % margin of safety (below the 30 % target).

Assumptions:

Continued M&A-driven revenue boost (+ 20 % in Year 1).

Gradual decline to 4 % organic growth by Year 6.

Efficiency improvements (about 10 %) over the next 6 years.

Risk Factors:

M&A execution risk. Can Graham find and integrate more acquisitions?

Operational risks. Will efficiency gains materialize as projected?

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to 10 Jan 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Graham Corporation's Struggle Is Bearing Fruits, But It Is Not Over Yet”

Graham Corporation’s Bold Bet: Growth Play or M&A Gamble?

4. Impinj

Riding the IoT Boom, But Is Its Stock a Ticking Time Bomb?

Impinj operates in the Internet of Things (IoT) sector, providing RFID-based solutions that connect physical items to the internet for tracking, management, and data analytics. The company primarily generates revenue from two product segments:

Endpoint ICs – Small chips attached to products for tracking.

Systems – Readers, gateways, software, and cloud services for analyzing collected data.

Revenue Growth & Industry Outlook

The IoT market is expected to grow at a double-digit rate, with forecasts projecting a CAGR between 18.8% and 26% over the next decade.

However, while the industry is expanding, Impinj has yet to achieve sustained operating profitability.

Profitability Challenges & Turnaround Paths

Despite strong revenue growth, Impinj has reported net losses since its 2016 IPO.

Break-even revenue challenge. Estimated at USD 370 million, but 2025 projected revenue is only USD 345 million.

Margin stability issues. Contribution and gross profit margins have remained stagnant over the past decade.

Fixed cost pressures. SGA, R&D, and other fixed expenses have constrained profitability.

Paths to turnaround:

Revenue growth. Sustained double-digit revenue growth could push Impinj past break-even.

Margin improvements: A USD 15 million annual licensing fee (from the legal settlement) could boost gross margins by 12%.

Cost optimization. Fixed cost as a percentage of revenue has declined post-2020, signalling potential for improved operating leverage.

Peer Comparison

Compared to industry peers in the RFID and IoT connectivity sectors, Impinj struggles with:

Weak profitability – Negative EBIT margins and consistent net losses.

Cash flow challenges – Free cash flow margins have remained negative.

Low capital efficiency – Impinj’s return on capital lags behind peers.

On the positive side, larger industry players have demonstrated that profitability is achievable with scale, suggesting Impinj could turn around if it continues growing.

Financial Position

Impinj has a moderately sound financial position despite persistent losses:

USD 170 million in cash (36% of total assets as of Sep 2024).

Debt-to-capital ratio. 68%, down from a 2021 peak of 104% (peer average: 49%).

Cumulative operating cash flow: USD 9 million despite cumulative net losses of USD 219 million.

While Impinj has historically struggled with consistent positive cash flow, its recent cash balance indicates it is not in immediate danger of a liquidity crisis.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimate: USD 42 per share compared to market price (Jan 2025): USD 143 per share. There is no margin of safety.

Key valuation assumptions:

5-year revenue ramp-up to USD 788 million.

Contribution margin improvement from licensing fees.

No significant additional margin expansion beyond historical averages.

For the current stock price to be justified, Impinj would need to sustain 26 % annual revenue growth and significantly improve contribution margins - a scenario with little historical precedent.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to 14 Jan 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Impinj Is Taking Off, But The Market Has Overestimated Its Profit Path”

5. Limbach

Transformation Story with an Overstretched Valuation

Limbach is transforming from a traditional subcontractor in mechanical, electrical, and plumbing construction into a higher-margin facilities services provider. The company’s focus on its Owner Direct Relationships (ODR) segment is driving improved profitability and return on capital. However, the current valuation appears to price in aggressive assumptions about revenue growth and operational efficiency not yet supported by its track record.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue was flat from 2017–2024, but net income rose sharply to USD 31 million in 2024 (vs. breakeven in 2017), driven by margin expansion.

Post-2020 shift to ODR segment improved overall gross profit despite lower general contracting relationship (GCR) revenues.

Operating margin improved from 1.5% (2017–2020 average) to 5.0% (2021–2024 average).

ROIC increased from 5% (2017) to 21% (2024); ROE rose from 1% to 20% over the same period.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

ODR business contributed higher margins and more recurring revenue, offsetting the GCR scale-down.

SGA grew slower than gross profit, resulting in stronger operating leverage.

Reinvestment rate (2021–2024) averaged 108% due to acquisitions; adjusted rate excluding M&A was 15%.

Peer Performance

Revenue growth (post-2020) lagged peers which delivered double-digit CAGR.

ROIC and EBIT margin improving but still below peer panel averages.

Levered free cash flow margin peaked in 2022–2023, but declined in 2024.

EPS performance weakest among peers; underperformance in profitability remains a concern.

Financial Position

Cash of USD 45 million as of Dec 2024 (13% of assets); debt-equity ratio of 32%, down from 139% in 2019.

Operating cash flow of USD 165 million (2017–2024) vs cumulative PAT of USD 68 million—strong cash conversion.

CAPEX and acquisitions fully funded by internal cash flow.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Market price of USD 79 per share (Mar 2025) implies:

Revenue growth of 15% in Year 1 tapering to 4% in terminal year.

EBIT margin expansion from 8% to 11% (peer-best).

Capital efficiency and ROIC improving to 26% (vs 21% in 2024).

Current valuation offers no margin of safety and assumes near-perfect execution and peer-beating performance.

Conclusion

Limbach’s strategic shift toward ODR services has improved margins, returns, and backlog quality, creating a more resilient business model. However, the current share price reflects optimistic expectations that exceed both its historical delivery and realistic industry benchmarks. Without clear evidence of accelerated growth and capital efficiency gains, the stock appears overvalued.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 31 March 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Limbach's Pivot To Facilities Services: A Hidden Gem Or A Mirage?”

6. MasTec
Booming Revenue, Lagging Margins — Transition Still in Progress

MasTec has evolved into a diversified infrastructure player with 59% of revenue from recurring Master Service Agreements (MSAs) by 2024. While this strategic pivot has driven strong top-line growth, profitability and efficiency have lagged. The company’s 2024 rebound shows promise, but until margins and returns improve consistently, the investment case remains speculative. Even under optimistic assumptions, valuation offers only a modest margin of safety.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew at 18% CAGR (2020–2024), outpacing the sector’s low single-digit growth.

Majority of revenue (59%) in 2024 derived from MSAs vs. ~33% pre-2020.

PAT and returns declined from 2020 to 2023 despite higher sales; signs of recovery emerged in 2024.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Gross and contribution margins declined 2020–2023 due to inflation, supply chain issues, and material-heavy contracts; both improved in 2024.

SGA and fixed cost margins increased over the same period.

Fixed-cost-light model (~10% of costs) supports operating leverage potential with margin stabilization.

Peer Performance

MasTec delivered one of the highest revenue CAGRs (2020–2024) among peers.

Post-2020 performance metrics:

ROIC: Consistently the weakest among peers, despite slight 2024 rebound.

EBIT Margin: Fell from best (2020) to worst (2024).

Free Cash Flow Margin: Rebounded in 2024 to second best after bottoming in 2022.

EPS: Among the worst performers since 2022.

Financial Position

Cash balance of USD 400 million as of Dec 2024 (4% of assets).

88% debt-equity ratio, down from 128% in 2022.

Strong cash flow conversion: USD 3.9 billion CFO vs. USD 0.8 billion PAT (2020–2024).

CAPEX and acquisitions fully funded by operating cash flow; reinvestment rate structurally low.

Historical negative reinvestment rate (2020–2024) due to strong working capital inflows and D&A offsets.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Market price (Mar 2025): USD 117 per share intrinsic value estimate: USD 130 per share → 11% margin of safety.

WACC used: 11.2%; sensitivity analysis suggests value increases to USD 162 if WACC drops to 10%.

Conclusion

MasTec has made credible progress in repositioning toward long-term, recurring revenue via MSAs. However, margin pressure, declining returns, and peer underperformance have delayed the payoff. While the 2024 rebound offers hope, financial fundamentals have not yet caught up to the growth story. With only an 11% margin of safety even under favorable assumptions, the stock is not an attractive long-term value opportunity at current prices.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 3 April 2025 Seeking Alpha article “MasTec's Revenue Growth Isn't Telling The Whole Story”

7. Microchip Technology

A Hidden Crisis No One’s Talking About?

Microchip Technology operates in the semiconductor sector, specializing in embedded control solutions. While the company attributes its recent revenue decline to macroeconomic conditions and industry inventory adjustments, financial trends suggest deeper issues, particularly in product development.

Revenue Growth and Competitive Position

Long-term growth. From 2016 to 2025, revenue grew at an 11% CAGR, higher than the projected 5.79 % to 7.2 % industry growth rate.

Growth through acquisitions. Over the past decade, acquisitions (USD 11 billion) far outpaced CAPEX investments (USD 2 billion), implying limited organic growth.

Organic growth concerns. Since 2020, with minimal acquisitions, revenue grew only at 1 % CAGR, suggesting in-house product development struggles.

Industry comparison: In FY2024, while the global semiconductor sector grew, Microchip Technology's revenue declined by 9.5 %, underperforming peers.

Cost Structure and Profitability Challenges

High fixed-cost business model. Fixed costs account for over two-thirds of total costs, making revenue declines highly impactful on profitability.

Declining profitability since 2023: Despite consistent R&D investment (about 15 % of revenue), declining contribution margin since 2020 suggests inefficiencies.

Operational adjustments. The company is shutting down Fab 2 to save USD 90 million annually, but past efficiency trends raise concerns about achieving full cost benefits.

Peer Performance

Revenue performance. While Microchip Technology had strong historical revenue growth, 2023 to 2024 revenue decline (- 9.5 %) was steeper than peers' average (- 0.9 %).

Profitability Metrics:

EBIT margin, among the best in 2024.

Return on capital: Improved from 2020 to 2023 but flattened in 2024.

Free cash flow margin: Stronger than some peers.

EPS growth: Lagging behind competitors.

Financial Position

Strong cash flow generation. USD 19.4 billion in operating cash flow (2016 to 2025) vs. USD 8.2 billion in PAT.

Debt Concerns. High 51 % debt-to-capital ratio (sector average: 6 %) is mitigated by strong cash flow generation.

Capital Allocation: Efficient, with surplus cash used for shareholder returns rather than excessive reinvestment.

Turnaround Challenges

Product development Issues likely. Revenue decline in a growing industry suggests weak product competitiveness rather than pure economic factors.

R&D spending vs effectiveness. While R&D investment has been stable, financial trends indicate difficulty translating it into successful new products.

Cost-cutting alone won't suffice. While cost reduction (e.g., Fab 2 closure) is necessary, a turnaround requires a stronger product pipeline.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Expensive compared to peers: Higher P/S and EV/EBIT multiples despite revenue struggles.

Uncertain turnaround timeline. If product development is the core issue, recovery could take several years, making the stock risky at current valuations.

Potential misinterpretation risk: The financial interpretation aligns with possible product challenges, but a deeper technical assessment is needed.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 3 Jan 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Microchip Technology May Not Be Addressing The Correct Issues”

8. Mosaic
Global Reach, Weak Margins — A Cautionary Cycle Play

Mosaic has evolved into a global fertilizer powerhouse with a growing footprint in South America. While revenue has grown modestly over the past decade, profitability has deteriorated, and returns have trended downward. The company’s financial position remains sound, but its dependence on cyclical pricing and exposure to tariff risk limits its attractiveness. At current prices, the margin of safety is insufficient.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew at 2.5% CAGR (2015–2024), driven largely by price increases rather than volume growth.

2022 revenue spike was due to geopolitical supply shocks (e.g., Russia–Ukraine war); not a structural shift.

2024 PAT was only 20% of 2015 levels; net income has trended down despite top-line expansion.

Gross profitability and ROIC in 2024 were below 2015 levels, signalling long-term margin compression.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Mosaic controlled SGA costs well, but profitability remained volatile due to margin swings.

Contribution margins fluctuated with fertilizer prices; fixed cost margins averaged 14% over the decade.

No evidence of capital efficiency gains. Profitability trends reflect external market forces more than internal improvements.

Peer Performance

Mosaic is a mid-sized player among global peers.

Overall performance is average; peer benchmarks reinforce Mosaic's cyclical nature and structural limitations.

Financial Position

Cash balance of USD 273 million (1% of assets) as of Dec 2024.

Debt-equity ratio at 36%, down from 54% (2017).

Consistent positive CFO over the decade: USD 18.2 billion CFO vs. USD 7.9 billion PAT.

Capital allocation strong: internal cash flow covered CAPEX and acquisitions.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimated at USD 24 per share vs. market price of USD 23 per share (Mar 2025) → 3% margin of safety.

Current valuation offers minimal upside and significant downside risk if tariffs persist.

Conclusion

Mosaic has grown into a global fertilizer leader, but revenue gains have come from price inflation, not volume or efficiency. Margins remain exposed to commodity cycles, and potential tariffs on Canadian potash imports could further pressure profits. Despite a solid financial foundation and strong capital discipline, Mosaic lacks margin of safety at current prices. It is not an attractive long-term investment opportunity.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 6 March 2025 Seeking Alpha article

“Mosaic's Revenue Is Growing, But Investors Should Worry About Its Profits”

9. NetApp

Profit Machine Struggling to Grow

NetApp Inc. is a legacy enterprise IT vendor that has pivoted to meet modern cloud and hybrid storage demands. With a strong position in data management and storage software, it has maintained profitability but lags in revenue growth compared to newer cloud-native peers.

NetApp is a mature, high-margin player in hybrid cloud and enterprise storage, but faces weak topline growth (1.7% CAGR).

Cloud strategy includes acquisitions like Spot.io and Instaclustr.

Keystone and public cloud offerings reposition NetApp in recurring revenue segments.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue growth is minimal despite the software/services shift (55% of 2025 revenue).

Margin expansion, not sales, drove profit growth.

Contribution margin rose from 65% (2016) to 74% (2025).

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Product mix shift boosted margins.

Fixed cost discipline supported profit despite COVID-driven revenue dip.

Low reinvestment rate (5%) allowed strong shareholder returns.

Peer Comparison

Largest among peers, but weakest revenue growth.

Top-tier ROIC, EBIT margin, and EPS.

Average FCF margin; operates like a mature firm in a growth sector.

Financial Position

USD 2.2 billion cash (25% of assets); debt-capital ratio down to 72%.

USD 12.7 billion CFO vs USD 7.9 billion PAT (2016–2024).

Capital allocation focused on buybacks and efficiency.

Valuation & Investment Risk

No margin of safety in current valuation.

Strong margins limit further gains without revenue acceleration.

Needs topline catalyst to justify long-term upside.

Conclusion

NetApp’s strong profitability and efficiency metrics are impressive, but growth remains its Achilles' heel. Without a clear catalyst for accelerating revenue, the stock offers limited upside at current prices.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 13 Feb 2025 Seeking Alpha article “NetApp's Low Revenue Growth Has Limited Its Profit Expansion Potential.”

10. Nordson

Profitable and Disciplined, But Fully Priced

Nordson has delivered consistent profitability, a disciplined capital allocation record, and steady growth through acquisitions. However, its reinvestment-heavy strategy has eroded capital efficiency, and tariff risks could weigh on its U.S.-based export business. Despite its operational strengths, the current valuation offers no margin of safety, making it a hold rather than a buy for long-term value investors.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew at 5.3% CAGR (2015–2024), primarily via acquisitions; organic growth weakened from 2022–2024.

PAT rose at 10% CAGR, outpacing revenue growth due to improved cost leverage.

2024 gross profit margin was only marginally higher than in 2015, suggesting stable pricing power but limited margin expansion.

Operating profit growth was driven by disciplined SGA management and fixed cost control, not higher contribution margins.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Contribution margin was flat over the decade, indicating scaling with volume, not pricing power.

SGA margin declined steadily; fixed costs grew at just 4.2% CAGR vs. 5.3% revenue CAGR.

Asset turnover and gross profitability declined, suggesting weakening capital efficiency.

Peer Performance

Nordson’s revenue CAGR is slightly below the peer median.

ROIC and ROE declined over the decade, underperforming in capital return relative to peers.

Organic growth trailed peers; without acquisitions, topline growth would have been significantly weaker.

Financial Position

USD 130 million in cash as of Jan 2025 (2% of assets); debt-equity ratio reduced to 80% from 139% in 2017.

USD 4.6 billion in CFO vs. USD 3.7 billion in PAT (2015–2024), indicating strong cash conversion.

Reinvestment rate averaged 82% — significantly above the sustainable 37% implied by its ROIC and growth rate.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimated at USD 205 per share vs. market price of USD 207 per share (Mar 2025) → 0% margin of safety.

Tariff risks - Nordson’s U.S. manufacturing footprint (2/3 of capacity) makes it vulnerable.

Conclusion

Nordson is a well-managed, consistently profitable industrial company with a track record of growth via acquisitions. It has maintained margins and grown earnings through fixed-cost control. However, declining ROIC, high reinvestment, and reliance on acquisitions raise questions about long-term value creation. With no margin of safety and tariff risks looming, the stock is fairly valued and not attractive for new long-term positions.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 19 March 2025 Seeking Alpha article

"Nordson's Growth Strategy: Acquisitions, Tariffs, And The Investment Case"

11. Nutrien

Fertilizer Giant Faces Tariff Turbulence

Formed through the merger of Agrium and PotashCorp, Nutrien is now one of the world’s largest fertilizer companies. Its integrated retail and production network has made it a key supplier of agricultural inputs across North America and globally.

Nutrien is a global fertilizer leader, but potential US tariffs could raise costs and reduce valuation significantly.

The US accounts for 90% of retail sales and 2/3 of total revenue.

Potash segment is less vulnerable to tariffs; nitrogen and phosphate are more exposed.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew 4.9% CAGR (2018–2024), driven by pricing, not volume.

Peak in 2022 followed by declines in 2023–2024.

Operating in a cyclical, mature sector with volatile margins.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Cost base stable, but tariffs may increase the cost of sales by about 3%.

Most revenue is concentrated in the US, exposing it to trade policy shocks.

The retail segment EBIT margin is only about 5%.

Peer Comparison

Among global fertilizer leaders with top volume, but similar pricing volatility.

Revenue growth aligns with the sector average.

Margins and returns are exposed to external trade policy risks.

Financial Position

Healthy asset base and integrated operations.

No liquidity issues, but tariff risks distort valuation stability.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Base case value: USD 92 per share. With tariffs: USD 62 per share.

No margin of safety at current market price.

The market has not priced in the full tariff impact.

Conclusion

Despite being a market leader, Nutrien faces substantial tariff risk that the market has yet to price in. Given the impact on valuation and lack of a margin of safety, it’s a wait-and-see case.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 25 Feb 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Nutrien And U.S. Tariffs: No Overreaction, No Buying Opportunity”

12. Onto Innovation
Impressive Growth Story, But Fully Valued

Onto Innovation has delivered rapid post-merger growth, capitalizing on AI-driven demand for semiconductor inspection and metrology tools. With strong cost control, low reinvestment needs, and minimal debt, the company is financially sound. However, returns lag peers, and the current share price already reflects an optimistic growth scenario. While operationally attractive, the stock offers no clear margin of safety.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew at a 15% CAGR (2020–2024); PAT grew at a 60% CAGR over the same period.

Profitability gains driven by revenue growth and tax efficiency, not margin expansion.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

SGA margin declined steadily since 2019; fixed costs grew at 5% CAGR.

Contribution margin peaked in 2020, then trended downward; indicates limited pricing leverage.

Fixed costs accounted for about 50% of total costs, creating moderate operating leverage.

Peer Performance

Among peers Onto had:

Strong revenue growth but the weakest ROIC and EBIT margin.

Initially poor levered free cash flow margin, but improved to average by 2024.

Below-average EPS performance despite high topline growth.

Financial Position

USD 852 million cash as of Dec 2024 (~40% of total assets); debt-equity ratio at 0.8%.

Strong cash conversion: USD 836 million CFO vs. USD 720 million cumulative PAT (2020–2024).

CAPEX fully funded from operations; surplus cash not fully returned to shareholders.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value: USD 126 per share vs. market price of USD 125 per share (Mar 2025) → no margin of safety.

Risks: Optimistic margin and capital efficiency assumptions may not be sustainable.

Industry growth (5–7% CAGR) suggests Onto must gain share to maintain its current growth rate.

Conclusion

Onto Innovation is a growth leader in semiconductor metrology, supported by efficient operations, a low tax regime, and a strong financial base. Post-merger execution has been impressive. However, despite these strengths, the stock is fully priced. The current valuation already reflects aggressive assumptions on growth, margins, and capital efficiency, leaving little room for upside. Onto is a quality business — but not a value buy today.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 25 Feb 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Onto Innovation: Explosive Growth, But No Bargain”

13. Ouster
Long Runway, But No Margin of Safety Yet

Ouster has made operational progress since its merger with Velodyne, with revenue growth, improving gross margins, and reduced fixed costs. However, the company is still unprofitable and likely years away from breakeven. Although its balance sheet is healthy, the current valuation already bakes in aggressive assumptions — leaving no room for error or margin of safety.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew at a 49% CAGR (2021–2024), boosted by the Velodyne merger and broader customer reach.

Despite this, the company remains unprofitable; operating costs continue to exceed revenue.

2024 performance improved YoY due to better pricing, product mix, and post-merger synergies.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

High fixed-cost structure: about 50% of total cost base in 2024.

Contribution margin improved post-merger, but still far below peers and breakeven level.

Fixed costs reduced from 2022 to 2024 through headcount cuts and R&D consolidation.

Peer Performance

Compared to LiDAR and automotive tech peers:

Ouster had the highest revenue CAGR but weakest margin and profitability metrics.

Contribution margin remains low; only marginal improvement relative to peers.

EPS and free cash flow remain negative for all peers; industry as a whole remains early-stage and loss-making.

Peer trends suggest margin expansion and fixed-cost leverage are difficult at this.

Financial Position

Cash balance of USD 172 million (62% of total assets) as of Dec 2024.

Debt of USD 20 million; debt-equity ratio at 11%, down from 39% in 2023.

Operating cash flow was negative USD 34 million in 2024 — but cash runway of 5+ years at current burn rate.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimated at USD 8.63 per share vs. market price of USD 11.23 per share (Mar 2025) → no margin of safety.

High reliance on future margin expansion, cost discipline, and low reinvestment to justify valuation.

Conclusion

Ouster is building a scalable LiDAR business in a fast-growing market, and has made credible progress post-merger. Its strong balance sheet and lower cash burn provide it with breathing room. But breakeven is years away, and the current valuation assumes best-case execution. Without margin of safety and with material uncertainty around growth, margins, and future tax, Ouster remains a high-risk bet unsuitable for long-term value investors at this time.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 26 March 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Ouster's Path To Profitability: Can Growth Outrun The Burn?”

14. Pegasystems

Profit Recovery Amid Cloud Shift, But Is It Enough?

Pegasystems is a long-established enterprise software company known for its business process automation and customer engagement solutions. In recent years, it has undergone a strategic transformation to reposition itself in the growing cloud and AI-powered enterprise technology market.

Pegasystems transitioned from on-premises to a cloud-first, subscription-based model focused on AI-driven enterprise software. Revenue grew at a 9% CAGR over the past decade, with profits only emerging post-2022.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew steadily due to the subscription model shift, but profits only turned positive in 2023.

2018-2022 losses tied to cloud migration, legal costs, and high R&D spending.

Contribution margin and gross margin improved post-2020, suggesting sustainable gains.

Revenue remains highly concentrated in the US (~56%) despite global ambitions.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Fixed costs made up about 72% of total costs, indicating high operating leverage.

Fixed cost-heavy model offers upside potential through scalability.

Declining SGA margin post-2022 from cost cuts in office space and marketing.

R&D remains a large but necessary component due to tech sector dynamics.

Peer Comparison

Among smaller peers (<USD 2B revenue), Pegasystems had the lowest growth.

Past leader in ROIC and EBIT margin, but underperformed since 2018.

Recent recovery in returns; FCF margins remain weak.

Financial Position

USD 702 million cash (45% of assets) as of Sep 2024.

Debt-equity ratio improved from 84% in 2022 to 55% in 2024.

Good cash conversion: USD 937 million CFO vs cumulative losses over the past decade.

Valuation & Investment Risk

No margin of safety in valuation despite optimistic assumptions.

Slowing topline growth post-transition raises concerns.

Conclusion

While Pegasystems has successfully transitioned to a cloud-first model and returned to profitability, its legal liabilities and lack of margin of safety make it a cautious hold. Its operating leverage provides upside, but only if revenue growth resumes.

15. Red Violet

A High-Growth Story, But Fully Priced

Red Violet has delivered rapid growth and expanding margins, transforming from a spinoff into a profitable identity intelligence company. While operating efficiency and returns have improved significantly, its current valuation assumes sustained high growth and margin expansion. With no margin of safety, the stock does not meet value investing criteria despite its attractive fundamentals.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew at a 29% CAGR (2018–2024), with profitability turning positive in 2022.

Gross margin expanded from 47% to 81%; SGA margin declined from 81% to 58%.

Operating profit growth driven by cost absorption and scale rather than pricing power.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Contribution margin improved with higher sales volumes.

SGA controlled relative to revenue growth; fixed-cost leverage evident in profit growth post-2022.

Operating and capital efficiency metrics showed improving trends.

Peer Performance

Red Violet had:

Best revenue CAGR among peers from 2018–2024.

ROIC and EBIT margin lagged peers until 2024, where it caught up.

Levered free cash flow margin caught up by 2020, though still below average.

EPS improved significantly by 2023, though declined in 2024.

Financial Position

Cash balance of USD 36 million (36% of total assets) as of Dec 2024.

Virtually debt-free: 2% debt-equity ratio.

Strong cash flow generation: USD 61 million in CFO from 2018–2024 despite cumulative losses.

CAPEX and share buybacks funded from internal cash.

Reinvestment rate high due to low profits, but expected to normalize as returns continue improving.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimated at USD 31 per share vs. market price of USD 39 per share (Mar 2025) → no margin of safety.

Risks: Valuation outcomes are highly sensitive to growth and margin assumptions.

Conclusion

Red Violet is a compelling growth company in the expanding identity intelligence space, with improving profitability, strong operating leverage, and a disciplined financial structure. However, even under an optimistic scenario, the current valuation provides no margin of safety. For a value investor, this remains a growth story worth watching — but not buying at current prices.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 8 March 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Red Violet's Explosive Growth - Is It Too Late To Buy?”

16. Targa Resources

Midstream Giant With Fee-Based Resilience

Targa Resources is one of the largest independent midstream infrastructure companies in North America. It operates across natural gas gathering, processing, transportation, and logistics, and has significantly evolved from a commodity-sensitive model to a fee-based toll-like operator.

Targa shifted from commodity-sensitive operations to a fee-based midstream model, driven by expansion in the Permian Basin.

Business model now mirrors toll operators: stable, volume-based revenue.

Full transition to fee-based contracts reduces exposure to commodity swings.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

18% CAGR from 2022 to 2024 post-COVID recovery.

Profit rebound post-2020, despite volatile gross margins due to hedging effects.

Logistics & Transportation (fee-based) now dominates revenue.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Volumetric growth offset declining gross margins.

SGA margin declined; limited improvement in inventory turnover and operating margins.

Hedging impacted gross margins significantly in 2021–2022.

Peer Comparison

Among the smaller midstream firms, but led in revenue growth.

Historically poor ROIC has now turned top-tier.

Below-average EBIT margin and EPS performance.

Financial Position

Cash flow is strong, but the cash position is low.

High reinvestment rate (~130%) and debt-capital ratio are concerns.

Financial discipline is evident in the recent shareholder return focus.

Valuation & Investment Risk

No margin of safety at current price.

Valuation attractive only with ~30% price correction.

Long-term growth supported by Permian Basin expansion and infrastructure scale.

Conclusion

Targa’s fee-based transformation enhances stability, but high reinvestment needs and leverage raise concerns. At the current valuation, there is no margin of safety. A price correction would make it more attractive.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 6 Feb 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Targa Resources: From Commodity Exposure To Fee-Based Stability.”

17. Tetra Tech
Acquisition-Led Compounder with Limited Margin of Safety

Tetra Tech has built a high-margin, cash-generative consulting business through disciplined capital allocation and frequent acquisitions. It has consistently grown revenue, expanded margins, and improved capital efficiency. While fundamentals are strong, the stock offers only a modest margin of safety — making it worth monitoring, not buying yet.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew at a 10.8% CAGR (2015–2024), largely acquisition-driven.

PAT grew faster at 26.8% CAGR, supported by margin expansion and cost control.

ROA more than tripled from 2015 to 2024.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Gross margin rose from ~17.8% (2015/16) to ~19.7% (2023/24).

SGA margin declined from 9.4% to 8.2%, signalling cost leverage from scale.

Fixed costs accounted for a relatively low portion of total costs, enabling profit sensitivity to margin improvement.

NOPAT per employee rose ~45% over the decade, indicating rising productivity.

Peer Performance

Among listed peers, Tetra Tech:

Had one of the highest 10-year revenue CAGRs despite smaller scale.

Ranked among the top for ROIC, EBIT margin, and levered free cash flow margin.

Had weaker EPS growth compared to peers, though with an upward trend.

Peer benchmarking underscores Tetra Tech’s superior profitability and disciplined execution.

Financial Position

USD 248 million in cash (6% of total assets) as of Dec 2024.

Debt-to-equity ratio improved to 64% from 78% (2023); balance sheet remains sound.

Cumulative CFO of USD 2.5 billion (2015–2024) vs. USD 1.8 billion PAT — strong cash conversion.

Reinvested about 46% of NOPAT, mostly via acquisitions

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimated at USD 36 per share vs. market price of USD 29 per share (Mar 2025) → 24% margin of safety.

Risks:

Dependence on M&A for growth.

Future acquisition opportunities may be limited or costly.

Moderate optimism embedded in long-term margin and growth assumptions.

Conclusion

Tetra Tech has compounded revenue and profits through disciplined acquisitions, steady margin expansion, and strong cash flow conversion. It stands out for operational excellence and capital discipline. While fundamentals are attractive, the current price offers only a 24% margin of safety — slightly below the 30% threshold for value investors. It remains a high-quality business worth monitoring for a more favourable entry point.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 15 March 2025 Seeking Alpha article

Tetra Tech Bought Its Way To The Top, Can It Keep Doing This?

18. Verisign
A Cash-Printing Monopoly Facing an AI-Era Reckoning

Verisign operates one of the most profitable, capital-light businesses in internet infrastructure — the exclusive registry for .com and .net domains. Its regulatory protections and long-term contracts provide stability and high margins. But declining domain volumes and the rise of AI threaten the foundational relevance of its business model. Despite solid fundamentals, the stock lacks a margin of safety and faces structural risks that are not fully priced in.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew at a 4.4% CAGR (2015–2024), driven by price increases rather than volume growth.

PAT grew at an 8.6% CAGR, outpacing revenue due to expanding gross margins and SGA efficiency.

Number of registered domain names declined at a –0.9% CAGR (2021–2024), reflecting structural industry shifts.

Average price per domain rose at a 6.4% CAGR (2021–2024), offsetting volume declines temporarily.

FCF yield declined from 6.3% (2015–16) to 4.0% (2023–24), indicating diminishing investor returns.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Gross margin rose steadily from ~60% in 2015 to ~85% in 2024; SGA margin declined from ~18% to ~10%.

Fixed costs are low, enabling strong operating leverage and high contribution margins.

Capital-light model: reinvestment rate effectively 0% over the past 5 years.

Peer Performance

Peers include Cloudflare, GoDaddy, Akamai, and Team Internet — each offering broader service models.

Verisign outperforms peers on ROA, EBIT margin, FCF margin, and EPS despite slower top-line growth.

Verisign’s performance relies on its unique “regulated monopoly” model — not easily replicable.

Peer businesses hint at alternative growth paths, but these may dilute Verisign’s high margin profile.

Financial Position

USD 1.1 billion in cash, negligible debt.

Strong cash conversion: USD 2.6 billion in CFO (2015–2024) vs. USD 2.0 billion in PAT.

Minimal CAPEX requirements; reinvestment needs fully covered from internal cash flows.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimated at USD 230 per share vs. market price of USD 235 per share (Apr 2024) → no margin of safety.

Risks:

AI may disintermediate traditional DNS usage, reducing demand for .com/.net domains.

Declining domain volumes suggest structural headwinds, not cyclical softness.

Regulatory and contractual limits cap price increases (max 7%/year).

Conclusion

Verisign is a rare cash-printing business — capital-light, high-margin, and protected by regulation. It enjoys strong pricing power and minimal reinvestment needs. But the steady erosion in domain volumes, coupled with the potential for AI to bypass the traditional DNS-based internet model, poses a long-term existential risk. Even under conservative assumptions, there is no margin of safety. In a post-AI digital world, domain names may lose relevance. Verisign may find its cash flows and moat under threat. For value investors, Verisign is a hold at best, not a buy.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 11 April 2025 Seeking Alpha article “VeriSign Prints Cash - But Is AI About To Pull The Plug?”

19. Westlake Chemical Partners

High Yields, But Is Growth Off the Table?

Westlake Chemical Partners (WLKP) is a master limited partnership formed by Westlake Corporation to own and operate ethylene production facilities. The company generates revenue by selling 95% of its ethylene output to Westlake under a long-term Ethylene Sales Agreement, ensuring fixed-margin pricing and cost recovery.

WLKP owns:

Three ethylene production facilities with a capacity of 3.7 billion pounds per year.

A 200-mile ethylene pipeline.

This structure limits revenue growth but provides predictable cash flows and profitability.

Revenue Growth & Industry Outlook

WLKP’s revenue has remained flat over the past decade (USD 1.1 billion in 2024 vs USD 1.0 billion in 2015), driven by:

No major capacity expansion or acquisitions.

Fixed-margin pricing, which prevents margin expansion.

Cyclical ethylene pricing, causing short-term revenue fluctuations.

Ethylene market growth remains modest:

US demand grew 4 % annually (2022 to 2024).

Global market projected to grow at 5.3% CAGR (2024 to 2032).

Since WLKP’s revenue is tied to ethylene volume rather than price, long-term growth potential is limited.

Profitability & Efficiency Trends

Despite stagnant revenue, WLKP has delivered strong returns:

Average ROIC: 28% (well above cost of capital).

Average ROE: 38%, amplified by MLP tax advantages and leverage.

However, efficiency trends have been mixed:

Stable operating profit margin but no significant improvements.

Declining contribution margin, indicating rising variable costs.

No major improvements in capital efficiency over the past decade.

The low fixed-cost model (17% of total costs) provides stability, but caps upside potential during industry booms.

Financial Stability & MLP Metrics

As an MLP, WLKP focuses on cash distributions rather than growth. Key metrics:

Distributable cash flow. Stable, but growth has slowed post-2016.

Distribution coverage ratio. Near 1.0, indicating WLKP has consistently met payout obligations.

Debt/EBITDA. Below 1.0, showing strong leverage management.

While the declining Distributable cash flow trend is a concern, WLKP remains financially sound with a sustainable payout structure.

Competitive Position & Peer Comparison

WLKP is the smallest among its ethylene sector peers and has the lowest revenue growth rate (2015 to 2024). However, it outperforms competitors in:

Return on capital – Most stable among peers.

Profitability – Maintains a fixed-margin advantage, while peers have declining EBIT margins.

Cash flow stability – Unlike peers, WLKP avoids the volatility of commodity price swings.

This defensive structure protects downside risk but limits upside potential.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimate of USD 24 per share compared to the market price (Jan 2025) of USD 24 per share. There is no margin of safety.

Key valuation assumptions:

Zero revenue growth (reflecting historical trends).

Distributable cash flow-based valuation, accounting for MLP distribution model.

No margin expansion, as the fixed-margin contract prevents pricing power improvements.

Potential upside exists if unexpected capacity expansion or acquisitions occur, but no catalysts currently support growth assumptions.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to 17 Jan 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Westlake Chemical Partners: Despite Its High Returns, It Is Not An Opportunity For Value Investors”

20. Westlake Corp

A Growth Machine or an Acquisition Black Hole?

Westlake Corporation is a diversified global materials and specialty chemicals company, operating under two business segments:

Performance and essential Materials.

Housing and Infrastructure Products.

The Performance and Essential Materials segment contributes about two-thirds of revenue, while the U.S. accounts for 70% of total sales.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Westlake delivered 11.7 % revenue CAGR over the past decade, driven by acquisitions rather than organic growth.

PAT has been highly volatile and lower in 2024 than in 2015.

ROIC and ROE have declined over time, despite staying above the cost of capital.

Operating margins are deteriorating, with:

Gross profit and contribution margins on a downtrend.

SGA margin increasing, pushing fixed costs up (from 14% of revenue in 2015/16 to 17% in 2023/24).

Operational & Capital Efficiency Challenges

Declining operating efficiency. Key metrics such as ROA, inventory turnover, and cost control have worsened.

Capital efficiency struggles. Only reinvestment margin has improved, while asset turnover and cash conversion have weakened.

Growth Strategy & Reinvestment

Growth comes primarily from acquisitions, with limited organic expansion.

High reinvestment rate (83 % of NOPAT).

USD 6.5 billion in acquisitions vs. USD 7.5 billion in CAPEX (2015 to 2024). This suggests acquisitions drove at least half of revenue growth.

No clear profitability improvement from acquisitions. Average PAT dropped from USD 0.5 billion (2015/16) to USD 0.3 billion (2023/24) despite major acquisitions.

Competitive Position & Peer Comparison

Westlake is smaller than many industry peers but has outpaced them in revenue growth. Overall Westlake ranks slightly above average compared to its competitors.

EBIT margin among the best, but returns on capital are only average.

Levered free cash flow margin has improved, signalling better cash conversion.

EPS remains volatile, mirroring the cyclical nature of the business.

Financial Position

Westlake remains financially sound and a strong cash generator.

USD 2.9 billion cash (14 % of total assets) as of Sep 2024.

Debt-equity ratio improved to 49 % (down from 98 % in 2016).

USD 17.1 billion in operating cash flow (2015 to 2024) vs. USD 9.3 billion PAT indicating strong cash conversion.

Capital allocation is disciplined. Cash flow has covered CAPEX and acquisitions, with excess capital returned to shareholders.

The main financial concern is the high reinvestment rate due to acquisitions.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimates:

Scenario 1 (No further acquisitions, 4 % organic growth) - USD 106 per share.

Scenario 2 (Continued acquisitions, 12 % initial growth declining to 4 %) – USD 161 per share.

Market price (Jan 2025) – USD 118 per share.

No margin of safety in Scenario 1, but a 36 % margin of safety in Scenario 2.

Key valuation concerns:

Efficiency risk. Scenario 2 assumes capital efficiency improvements, despite no historical evidence.

Acquisition risk. If efficiency declines as the company grows, acquisitions could destroy value rather than enhance it.

For Westlake to justify continued acquisitions, management must demonstrate improved efficiency.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to 20 Jan 2025 Seeking Alpha article “Westlake: Revenue Growth Meets Shrinking Return”

21. Zebra Technologies
Profitable and Positioned, But Needs to Prove It Can Grow

Zebra has built a high-margin, capital-efficient business in enterprise mobility and asset intelligence, supported by disciplined cost control and strategic repositioning. However, its long-term revenue growth has significantly lagged its high-growth addressable markets. The company’s ability to sustain margin gains is credible, but future returns hinge on whether Zebra can finally unlock its growth potential. At current valuations, there is no margin of safety — but meaningful upside exists if growth accelerates or market risk perception improves.

Revenue Growth & Profitability Trends

Revenue grew at just a 3.5% CAGR (2015–2024), despite operating in double-digit growth sectors.

Gross margins improved driven by product mix and pricing power.

Operating income grew from USD 222 million (2015) to USD 765 million (2024); net income recovered from losses to USD 528 million.

Zebra’s shift toward higher-margin SaaS, robotics, and AI-enabled solutions enhances future scalability and earnings potential.

Operational Efficiency & Cost Structure

Contribution margins and SG&A efficiency improved, though revenue remains overly reliant on legacy product lines.

Fixed costs declined as a % of total cost over the decade, lowering operating leverage but improving downside protection.

Strong cost discipline during downturns (e.g., 2023 restructuring) helped preserve margins and focus on profitable growth.

Peer Performance

Zebra ranked No. 2 in revenue size and No. 3 in 2024 growth rate.

Zebra ROIC peaked from 2018–2022, later declined but remains solid; EPS improved markedly since 2019.

Its EBIT and FCF margins rated average, but improving trends show strategic pivot gaining traction.

Zebra’s capital efficiency and earnings quality suggest growing separation from peers, despite modest top-line growth.

Financial Position

USD 901 million in cash (11% of total assets) as of Dec 2024.

Debt-equity ratio reduced from 340% (2015) to 66% (2024), reflecting deleveraging.

Strong cash generation: USD 6.0 billion CFO vs. USD 3.3 billion PAT (2015–2024).

Low average reinvestment rate (6%).

Cash flow from operations more than covered CAPEX and acquisitions; excess returned via debt repayment and buybacks.

Valuation & Investment Risk

Intrinsic value estimated at USD 215 per share vs. market price of USD 225 per share (Apr 2024) → no margin of safety.

Sensitivities:

If revenue grows 10% tapering to 4%, intrinsic value rises to USD 268 per share.

If revenue grows 10% and margins improve 10%, intrinsic value increases to USD 330 per share.

Conclusion

Zebra is financially solid, strategically focused, and operationally efficient. But it has not yet delivered the top-line growth its markets suggest is possible. Its transition toward automation, AI, and SaaS is margin-accretive and promising, but the market has already priced in much of the profitability. With no margin of safety under conservative assumptions, Zebra remains a high-quality business worth monitoring, especially if growth or discount rates shift in its favour.

For details of the analysis and valuation, refer to the 16 April 2025 Seeking Alpha article

“Zebra Technologies: Great Business, Mediocre Growth”

Note: There are also other US stocks in my article "Are you looking for US stocks to make money?"

END

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

How to be an Authoritative Source, Share This Post

If the above article was useful, you can find more insights on how to make money in my e-book. The e-book is now available from Amazon, Kobo and Google Play.

PS: If you are in Malaysia or Singapore, the e-book can only be download from Kobo and Google Play.

Disclaimer & Disclosure
I am not an investment adviser, security analyst, or stockbroker. The contents are meant for educational purposes and should not be taken as any recommendation to purchase or dispose of shares in the featured companies. Investments or strategies mentioned on this website may not be suitable for you and you should have your own independent decision regarding them.

The opinions expressed here are based on information I consider reliable but I do not warrant its completeness or accuracy and should not be relied on as such.

I may have equity interests in some of the companies featured.

This blog is reader-supported. When you buy through links in the post, the blog will earn a small commission. The payment comes from the retailer and not from you.

Your link text